Religion Journey

Losing my religion... and finding my tribe

In 2006, my life changed drastically. My husband of 7 years took my children without telling me and moved from North Carolina to Texas, and I followed at break-neck speed. In the few months preceding his exit from our life in North Carolina, we had determined that our lives were going separate ways. He did not, however, warn me that the next 3 years were going to tear my life down to its foundation, that or that the 3 years after that would rebuild it with tears and struggles and small victories.

My name is Joni, and I am an ex-fundamentalist Christian. Raised in a very conservative family in a very conservative town, it was easy to just follow along. When I began to think for myself, eyebrows were raised, whispered exchanged. When I asked the wrong questions, I was, gently at first, then later more harshly, rebuked. When I questioned whether the orders passed down to me by my spiritual authority were really God’s will, I was disciplined.

I wanted so much to please God, but I couldn’t understand how he could make me one way and then require me to be a completely different person. Wouldn’t it have been easier if he had just made me right the first time, instead of making me something that he didn’t want me to end up being? I tried very hard to change and when that proved impossible, I lied and pretended I was this new creation. When lying became more than I could handle, I just let it go and built a wall so caring didn’t hurt as much.

Looking at the wreckage that was my life, I began to pick through what I would carry on from here. Sifting through debris, I found my faith in marriage in shambles. I found my faith in relationships charred and scattered bits on the edge of my life.

Even my foundation – religion and Christianity – was cracked and beyond repair. If I was going to build again, nothing could come with me save love and hope. Love I held close to me throughout the storm. I knew that Love existed, I believed that Love was real. I loved my children without reservation and I hoped that with Love and Hope I could rebuild a life – perhaps a life that was authentic.

Before I lost my religion, I often wore a cross. It was about an inch long and a half inch wide.
I didn’t wear a collar, or carry around a new testament. I didn’t have a tattoo of bloody Jesus on my shoulder, or a bumper sticker that says “My boss is a Jewish Carpenter.”
I didn’t even wear a WWJD bracelet.

Outside of my cross, no one could really look at me and say: "Oh, there’s a Christian. She believes in God and accepted Jesus as her Savior. "

Even with the cross, most people wouldn't jump to that conclusion because this is America: land of the free, home of the brave, and welcoming to everyone… EXCEPT if you believe differently. Or if you call God a different name, or if you choose to love the wrong person…or if – God forbid – you refuse to eat pork.

Mostly, this is America, a majority “Christian” nation.

And that cross around my neck? It was an accessory.

Growing up with my parents in ministry, and being in church leadership myself, I never HAD to wear my religion on the outside. I had never been criticized or persecuted for being Christian. I had rarely been told – except by the occasional enthusiastic Mormon – that the way I worship is wrong. And I’ve certainly never felt like my freedom to be a Christian was in danger.

Even in a life sadly devoid of obstacles to belief system, my spiritual experience has influenced me as a woman. I perceive the world differently because of my religious upbringing, because of the spiritual beliefs I held for so many years. I was brought up to believe that Christians hold the patent on "right", and everyone else can literally "go to hell."

I mean, to dig down deeper, even other Christian subcultures are condemned within the larger, mostly Protestant, Christian community I have experienced. There definitely WAS a right and a wrong way to love God.

I read a book called The Fourty Rules of Love by Elif Shafak and that tore down the first brick in my perspective on loving God... it was the beginning of the end of my religion. The book was written about the Shams of Tabriz, Rumi’s (the mystic Sufi poet) teacher and mentor, who taught him about love. The Shams taught Rumi of love, and unlocked a world of mystery and beauty for one of the most influential Muslim teachers who ever lived. In the book, Shams told a parable about loving God "correctly" and it was part of the beginning of my eyes being opened to the idea that perhaps there is more than one correct way to love God. Since I grew up believing that there was only one way to love God and that my perspective on God (the Christian perspective) was the ONLY [right] perspective, I believed that other religions were worshipping someone other than "my" God, the REAL God.

Shafak's book raised some questions that were becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. And with so many of my core beliefs in question at this point, I decided to write down what I knew as my truth:
  • Love must be personal to be real. My parents can’t convey their love for the Divine to me, I must love god in a way unique to me.
  • Loving with abandon is ecstasy. And by abandon, I mean abandoning the “should’s” and the “supposed to’s”. I mean talking to God in your own language, and relating to God the way you were made you to.
  • Loving with abandon means taking off your cape and being vulnerable, it means allowing your soul to pull your heart into freedom.
  • It is our nature as humans to hope and to love.
  • Seeking God, pursuing love, learning trust - these are natural yearnings of the human heart.

These musings brought to mind some questions for me, in the arena of spirituality and being a woman:
How do our religious beliefs impact us as American women and change our perceptions of the world around us?
Are those impacts the same across the board, regardless of what religion you choose?
Are we all experiencing the same things in different environments?
And, more importantly, are we all experiencing the same God in a different context?

I was raised to judge the way that other people connected to God and the path that they took to reach him... But I have another foundational belief, that being: God is love.

In reality, what I was doing in my narrow minded belief system was prescribing a path to God based entirely upon my cultural context of God. If other's connection to God is real, and if their prayers are sincere, regardless of my personal or cultural belief system, I believe that a God of love cannot possibly ignore that. A God who is love cannot turn his back on himself and reject the love given to him.

The project began with a 6 month timeline. I spoke to and wrote about women from all walks of life, all ages and races, and all religions about why they made the spiritual choice they made.

My HOPE was to find out specifically how religion impacts women, and how American women relate to God.

As part of this project, I lived the religions I was studying. Not to say I converted to Judaism, or Islam, or Buddhism for 30 days a piece, but as I worshiped my God and Creator, I hoped to experience the Divine in a different way by seeing it from the perspective of others.

Talking to other women, experiencing their level of devotion and discipline in their relationship with God, whether I pray to their God or mine, would help me better understand my God, and give me a better picture of what truly empowers women around this country about their spirituality.

The first 30 days of this experiment was Islam, and I lived as a traditional Muslim woman - observing prayer times, wearing the hijab, and abstaining from alcohol and pork products – for 30 days.

I had never worn my religion on the outside. I had never been judged on site by the majority of the people I come in contact with. Heck, I had never been a minority! Even though I didn’t convert to Islam, people assumed I had. People looked at me differently, people judged me. Not because of who I was – because who I was didn’t change. They judged me because of who they thought I was, because of a preconception and a patent on RIGHT.

I was exploring all of the top 6 major religions in the US: Christianity (including Catholicism and Mormonism), Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Unitarianism. I wrote as I went. I met women and heard their perspectives. I heard story after story after story. After that, I didn’t know what would happen: I might have achieved enlightenment. I might have made everyone around me believe I was completely nuts. I might have made a lot of people hopping mad.
But, I welcomed input and opinions. I welcomed questions and insights. I was most interested in hearing about their perspective on God... because, after all, that is what this was all about.

The God who is love is the reason I began this project.

It was never supposed to get personal. You see, I started out this project with a set of beliefs and values. I wasn’t willing to compromise them or disbelieve them, and I wasn’t thinking that even the consideration of those prospects would be a problem. I thought that I could happily maintain my own belief system while objectively reporting on the beliefs of others.

I mean, granted, I was willing to see God in a new way. I was willing to explore the spiritual practices of other groups, and incorporate some of their views on God into my own theology, if the occasion arose where those beliefs did not clash with the beliefs that I already had. I was even willing to go so far as to say that what was right for me is not necessarily right for everyone, and their beliefs could be right for them and wrong for me. But I knew what I believed and my foundation wasn’t going to shift. I thought.

My first religion to study, Islam, came easily to me. They incorporated my own prophets from the Old and New Testament. They had some funny rules, but their stories were vastly similar. They believed in Adam and Eve (although they didn’t believe in original sin). They believed in mother Mary (although they didn’t believe Jesus was/is God). They believed in my "Christian" Jesus, as a prophet, much like their own prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him). Their teachings were of love and compassion and submission and I could identify with the beauty in their holy text. They worshipped Allah, but he was the same as my God, the God who created the world, who spent centuries seeking a relationship with us (his people) and pursuing our love.

Of course, I didn’t agree with many of the cultural infusions within Islam for myself, like the idea that women should be completely covered, or the justification of the Prophet to have many wives, or to kill innocent people in villages who didn’t agree with him.

I didn’t feel that the Arabic culture was a fit for myself, but I could understand how many identified with the black and white structured rules and contexts of Islam. There was direction within the Qura’n for every aspect of life and living, and I could completely understand how that prospect of understanding exactly how to please God would be attractive.

Catholicism was next, and as I read their text and teachings, again, I saw the similarities between Evangelical Christianity and Catholicism. I admired the tradition in the Catholic church. The intricate structure of leadership. The teachings and saints.

I loved how their priests and nuns abandoned all in reckless pursuit of Christ. I loved their prayers and was comforted by the Hail Mary and the Apostles Creed. Praying to saints seemed to me to be an easy step, because, they weren’t really worshipping their saints, they were just praying – talking – to them.

Confession was a brilliant concept, and I believed from a psychological point of view, that it would do the confessor good to get those wrongdoings off his chest. I loved reading about St. Teresa of Avila who described ecstatic encounters with her Lord: her descriptions of almost merging with God in beautiful love were incredible and undeniably rapturous.

I was fascinated. I was struck by other saints, like St. Francis who gave up wealth and fame when he heard a sermon that changed his life and ambition. He walked barefoot through the villages proclaiming God’s love and the need for repentance. He was full of compassion and peace, and his prayer made my heart swell with intention to follow his example:
Lord, make me an instrument of Your peace.
Where there is hatred, let me sow love;
where there is injury, pardon;
where there is doubt, faith;
where there is despair, hope;
where there is darkness, light;
and where there is sadness, joy.

O Divine Master, grant that I may not so much seek
to be consoled as to console;
to be understood as to understand;
to be loved as to love.
For it is in giving that we receive;
it is in pardoning that we are pardoned;
and it is in dying that we are born to eternal life.
Amen

Evangelical Christianity was next, and it was my own religion, so I was excited and fearful to study it from an objective viewpoint. I talked to women and, for one of the first times in my life, I found transparency and authenticity in the women I talked to who were Christian.

I happened to connect with a group of women who were so open and honest that it shocked and pleased me. I heard them talk about Jesus’ love, and God saving them from their lives. I listened and got tears in my eyes as they talked about their pain and the way that a relationship with God had changed them, had healed them, had given the hope, purpose, and a home. I heard humans who were yearning for this divine connection and were seeking it in the ways they could.

I started on Mormonism with a fascination for their beliefs which were far off the beaten path for me thus far.

While Islam closely reflects Judaism and Christianity in teaching, Mormonism was similar to a point until they took a sharp left and added entire portions unreflected in traditional Christianity to their beliefs. I read the history of Mormonism with some disbelief that a common criminal like Joseph Smith could somehow turn a money scheme into a religion. I studied his ideas and I could not find any way to make them believable for myself.

They were not just guidance and ideas, they were presented as “historical fact” and he was creating entire stories about peoples who existed, and events in history, and genetic composition of entire races that I found entirely unbelievable, too wild, even as I tried to remain objective.

But then I started thinking about my own religious stories in comparison to some of the religions I studied...

Was the Muslim rule that boys should pee sitting down more far-fetched than the Jewish law that men should not shave the corners of their beard?

And were the stories of Joseph Smith’s miraculous vision of angels and gift of golden tablets really that different from Jacob’s vision of a staircase to heaven and wrestling with an angel who knocked out his hip?

My own stories, in my own Bible were just as imaginative, they were just more familiar.

Did Noah really get the prize as the only righteous man and spend 40 years building an ark and collecting two of each of 10 million species of animal to go inside?

And then, was this righteous man so righteous that he spent the entire time after the flood drunk and naked?

Was God really SO ANGRY at two cities that he burned them down, men, women and children? And was it so terrible that Lot’s wife was literally turned into a life-sized human salt lick?

Would God ask Abraham to kill his only son, after giving that son to him in the first place?

Did he part the Red Sea and allow all the people of Israel to walk across on dry land, then kill all the Egyptians with the water?

Was it possible to walk on water? Turn water into wine? Why would someone drive evil spirits out of men and into pigs? Why was it ok for Solomon to have thousands of wives and mistresses, but he was considered the wisest of all men?

What in the world is going on in the book of Revelation?

So I had asked myself a question: “Do I believe the Book of Mormon to be true, factual and historically accurate?” And my answer was a resounding NO, based on logical examination of the interior of the BoM.

But, using the same logical examination, I had to ask myself if I believed the Bible to be true, factual and historically accurate. This question was a bad question to ask.

Because I could not look at the Bible and say that all of these things REALLY HAPPENED.

A guy gets swallowed by a fish and spends three days in there before being spit on shore? A man lays rods across a watering hole to make his sheep and goats have stripes?

Another guy turns his walking stick into a snake, then back into a stick?

Logically, I could see how these stories evolved – the Bible was made up of centuries of oral tradition, stories told verbally and passed down from generation to generation.

Changed up a little by each teller, added to in some places, taken away from in others.

Sitting around the campfire, it sounds so much more interesting to say that the people of Israel walked around Jericho once, then twice, then three times they walked.

Four times, they walked around the walls of the enormous fortified city. Five times, and the city’s residents were taunting them. Six times they circled the city. Seven times, and then BAM! The city just collapses into the ground.

That story is suspenseful and intriguing and shows the power of God!

And what about all the books that were left OUT of the Bible as we know it? The prophets who weren’t included? What about the books in the New Testament, the Gnostic Gospels of Mary Magdalene, or of Thomas, that weren’t included because perhaps they showed something that seemed a little out of character of gave women too much of a voice?

Are you telling me that the bible that I have 4 copies of in my home is the absolute perfect, infallible, inspired and COMPLETE word of God?

It was too much for me to believe. If I was examining Christianity as an outsider, trying to figure out what they believed, and I came across this creative and perfectly thrilling roll of stories with heroes and villains and suns standing still, and wars in the heavenlies, and giants and creatures of the deep and dragons with seven horns and virgins magically conceiving – I could not look at it and rationally believe it all to be true and factual.

Interesting, yes. Fascinating even. Entertaining and instructional. But not fact. Not historically accurate. No way.

When I had this thought on May 16, 2011, I was horrified.

If I don’t believe the Bible to be true in every sense of the word, this means that my foundation has been shaken. Everything that I accepted as truth is not true at all.

The “history” has been colored so that it is nearly unrecognizable. If I don’t believe in the infallible Bible, then I can’t be a Christian.

The thought was horrifying. I didn’t want to lose my Christian faith. But I could not sit there and say that I believed in 3 people who were actually one person who was actually a deity who was God. I couldn’t say that I believed, beyond a shadow of a doubt (and let’s face it, there was a lot more than a SHADOW), that Jesus was half God half man and was born to a VIRGIN after she and her fiancĂ© were visited by angels.

I couldn’t say that I believed that Jonah got swallowed by a whale or that God made Eve out of Adam’s rib, or that the tree of eternal life ever existed – Homer was more convincing than the Bible, and I was horrified by this discovery.

If I couldn’t say that any of that was for sure true, or even relatively close to true, then what was I supposed to do? Did God even exist? Did Jesus? Had I been wasting my days on this planet trying to understand a non-existent being? 

Were everyone’s beliefs so different because it didn’t really matter – they were ALL MADE UP?

I was sitting in Starbucks a few days later with a lady to interview about Jehovah’s Witness and I start telling her some of my problems.

She is listening in understanding and sympathy for my plight. A young man sitting next to me taps me on the shoulder and tells me he has overheard what I said about not knowing if any of it is real. He says that he doesn’t know much about the Bible, or the other religions I’m talking about, but that he knows from his own personal experience that the name of Jesus is powerful.

He recounts a story. Three days ago, he was in jail, sitting there, having lost his job and very depressed. He prayed to Jesus and since he didn’t know what to pray, he just prayed that Jesus would make him happy.

Thirty minutes later, he gets released from jail (seven days early). He has two job offers that very night to replace the job that he lost in jail. He doesn’t know much, but he knows that the name of Jesus is miraculous and healing and has changed his life.

But, I want to ask, are you REALLY changed?

Don’t you think it took more than 30 minutes to put through the papers for your release, so don’t you think that before you even prayed that prayer, it was in the works?

Don’t you think that the fact that you sent out resumes with intention to get a job resulted in the two job offers? Maybe not the son of God intervening in your life?

And are you really different than you were? Are you going to go out and do the same stupid things and make the same stupid mistakes and land yourself back in jail in 2 months, 6 months, a year?

And if you do, is that Jesus too? Or is it only Jesus when it’s a good thing?

Faith smiles at me and at the boy and tells me that it takes time and faith and study. Is it a coincidence that the person I am seeing during my crisis of faith is named FAITH?

Can disbelief and faith co-exist?
Disbelief: the inability or refusal to believe or to accept something as true.
Faith: confidence or trust in a person or thing; belief that is not based on proof

Indeed, the first described my crisis exactly: the inability to accept something as true.

And I could have faith in the sense that I trust in a force greater than myself, in a reason for being here, in a purpose and a destiny. But belief that is not based on proof?

Do I NEED proof to have faith in the principles of the Bible?

In reality, I do believe that the Bible teaches principles that are excellent and proven: love your neighbor as yourself. This leads to a happy and fulfilled, peaceful coexistence in the world.

I do believe that you should not murder or steal.

I believe that Jesus represented for us the relationship that God wants to have with us.
And I think I believe in God, or at least in a divine being or presence – I believe in divinity.
But almost all of my beliefs that are Biblical are because of proof: I can see how they work, how it is a good way to live, how they make for a better world and a better life.

Is there anything I really accept on faith alone? I guess I believe in an afterlife, and I have no proof that it exists. I suppose I believe that children who pass before we know them are waiting for us somewhere on the other side to reunite with us, they were part of us, after all. I want to believe that there is a loving God up there, watching me and filling me with joy and peace, and I want to say that I have felt that joy and peace, for indeed,  I have felt his presence, or something I describe as “his presence.”

But non-religiously, what do I accept on faith without proof of existence?
Love, certainly. I feel love, I love my children, I love Mark, I believe they love me back.  I can’t point at one thing other than the words “I love you” that would be proof positive that Love exists, yet I believe.
I believe in hope. Hope itself is faith in the positive and better future for myself and my children.
I believe in evil and good, although neither are necessarily quantifiable and both are certainly relative.

John 13:35 says “By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another." But does the fact that they love (or don’t love) one another really prove that they are his disciples? Can you love and NOT be his disciple? Maybe that is impossible and that is what Jesus was trying to say – you are his disciple when you love.

I believe that there is more to this world than my limited eyes can see. I believe there are mysteries everywhere we turn, and I DO believe that things exist that I cannot prove, but are still very real: fear, shame, love, trust, faith, courage, amazement, joy.

I think I thought at first I could rebuild on my foundation of Christianity. Some patches here and there were intact –  maybe I could put some putty in those cracks – surely I could go on with Christianity as part of my identity, right? But nagging my heart was the question I had asked my mom when I was 8: “If God is perfect and knows everything, why did he make me wrong? Why would he make me someone he doesn’t want me to be?”

Stepping away from Christianity has been a long process.

Excruciatingly painful at times, difficult to explain to others, especially my conservative family members.

My metamorphosis from Conservative Christian to Hippie Panendeist is a sight to behold… if you want to meet the opposite of me, just check out Joni circa 1999.

But, for the first time, I don’t feel like my beliefs have to be defensible. Because they are mine.

I don’t feel like I have to sell my relationship with God. Because it is mine.

And the fact that I don’t believe in legislated morality (aka legal marriage) but I do believe in love and commitment jives with my wholehearted hope in God and mankind.

I don’t have all the answers and in fact, I have fewer “answers” than I did when I was a Christian. Today I simply seek love and authenticity. The rest will fall into place on its own.

Maryanne Williamson’s words ring in my head. She writes:

“Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that frightens us most. We ask ourselves, ‘Who am I to be [called to the ministry]?’ Actually, who are you not to be?You are a child of God. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that people won’t feel insecure around you. We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It’s not just in some of us; it’s in all of us. And when we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.”

I visited a UU church last on my list.
They discussed spiritual practices there. 

We sat in a circle and one woman said her meditation is sometimes interrupted by rowdy birds.

Another said that reading some short prayers helped her get to a place where her mind was still and quiet.

A third said she had studied under a guru and a young girl eagerly (and wistfully) commented that she wanted one too. A guru, that is.


My turn came.

My spiritual practice… usually involves a lot of yelling, I said. Mostly it’s me yelling at God. This week, it was me threatening God that I am not going to believe in him anymore if he keeps this up.

But I can’t unbelieve it.

The words tumbled out of my mouth and a tear accompanied them.

I can’t unbelieve in God. I can redefine God, I can reimagine it, I can change my perspective and renegotiate the relationship I have with this Divine being. But I can’t unbelieve it.

The more I think of it, the angrier I become. I find myself dragging the bottom of my vocabulary pond to come up with the most distasteful words I can to say to God. I find myself spewing loud, angry euphemisms. The heavens do not break, the birds don’t stop flying, and I am still left here, driving and wiping hot angry tears from my eyes, asking why.

Why.

The question that has no answer.

The question invented to mock humanity in our non-divine nature.

This morning, there was a fly in my coffee. I smirked. Of course there was. Why wouldn’t there be?

My conversion to UU has been gradual. It started with opening my mind to worshipping god differently, through hearing other people’s stories. Losing my religion has been a long process. But finding my tribe was easier. In UU, I found myself surrounded by people with questions. In UU I found myself hugged by Ruby, invited in by Beth, surrounded by acceptance and love in Glen and in Daniel and in Uwe and Trish and Traci. None of them had an answer for my questions, but all of you had grace to hear them and question with me.

My favorite of the 7 principals is the one that says “We believe in a free and responsible search for truth and meaning.” For me, the freedom to search, even more so – the responsibility to search for truth and meaning was one of the things that knit Unitarian Universalism to my heart. It is the first thing that spoke to me and it continues to speak to me. But it’s hard work.

When I was a Christian, I didn’t spend a lot of time searching. The boundaries were tight, the search for truth and meaning extended only as far as the well-worn leather of my Bible, perhaps supplemented with John Piper, or Max Lucado, or Beth Moore. The Bible held the answers and it was my job to decipher them.

Our search, as Christians, was safe and surrounded by sign posts and people showing the way.

When I became a Unitarian, I reveled at first in the absolute freedom to believe anything or everything that I wanted to believe.

If I wanted to worship The Shiny Unicorn of Gratitude, there was space for that. If I wanted to continue to incorporate Jesus into my worship, that was ok too.
If I wanted to only “worship” my fellow humans and abandon all notions of God, that was ok. The problem for me is that I’ve never been very good at having a lot of options.

I don’t go to Baskin Robbins. The 39 flavors make me crazy. I can’t figure it out and I end up getting vanilla every time. I prefer the Chic-fil-a approach (before the boycott, that is). You get vanilla ice cream in a cone or in a cup. If you’re really living on the wild side, you get a brownie with it.

UU to me feels a little bit like Baskin Robbins sometimes. There are so many choices. And they are depending upon me to be responsible. Given the opportunity, I would probably choose a scoop of each flavor, tasting them all, then feeling incredibly sick later. It was easier to be a Christian. It was easier to have fewer choices and less autonomy. In my fundamentalist background, I had even fewer choices than the average Christian – there was no argument about what was acceptable or unacceptable, it was all pretty black and white.

While my wandering mind refuses to accept that there is an absolute right way to believe, I can accept that there is a best way for me. It’s harder for me to settle on what exactly that best is, but I can keep walking.

When I was a Christian, the only thing I wanted was to throw off my restraints and walk my own path. Get tattoos. Accentuate my vocabulary with curse words. Ask big questions. Find truth in other traditions. Find meaning in other experiences. See the beauty that is humanity and believe that humanity isn’t just failure apart from divinity.

The lost part of UU is the part that finds me despairingly ordering vanilla because I can’t wrap my mind around the choices. The lost part of UU is the hard part of UU for me: I can search, I can read, I can talk and I can listen, but I will always be searching. The lost part of UU is the hard part for me to reconcile – as I learn more and ask questions, I find myself on a winding road with no GPS signal and I wonder whether freedom with inherent responsibility is really all it’s cracked up to be.

So, “I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God.” God: not defined in the same way now. But I do press on for higher ground. I press on for the mountain top where I can survey my surroundings and make sense of the trees that begin to start looking the same.

I press on toward the voices I hear on the path in front of me, toward the traces of humanity I hear calling, toward the smell of a campfire and the promise of food for my soul. I press on past this place where I’m not quite sure if I’m lost or found.

Because being lost isn’t always a bad thing, but it’s almost always a challenge.
Losing my religion wasn’t easy, but I would trade it for my tribe every day of the week.